Is the Cause of Terrorism Islam, or Foreign Policy? :: September 11 Terrorism Essays

Was the Cause of family 11 Islam or Foreign Policy?   George W. Bush has taken a stand on the true reputation of Islam, calling it, for instance, a religion of peace. As strange as this is to hear from the president of the United States, Bushs declarations have given rise to a good circularize of useful public discussion about Islam. Unfortunately, this discussion has too often accepted the confused terms of the presidents rhetoric Is there, or is there not, something wrong in the nature of Islam? Salman Rushdie (Yes, This is About Islam, New York Times 11/2/01) and Jonathan Ebel (Territory is Not Mind, Sightings 11/15/01) both make some useful points in the process of taking up the question, but somehow leave standing the presidents fundamental misconception that a religion has an essence.   Surely it is not fair to say that family line 11 is about Islam. Violent hatred and intolerance can be adduced in too many corners of the religious world to imagine that it comes, si mply, from the doctrines of one beatified book or another. At the same time, it is difficult for me to blame Salman Rushdie, especially, for perceiving something within Islam today that is prone to violence. His non-violent, literary attack on Islam was, after all, taken by some Muslims to justify very real threats to his life. And, he marshals some reasonable evidence that many Muslims do believe that Islam is on board with the kinsfolk 11 terrorists.   Still, we ought not to decl atomic number 18 that September 11 is about Islam, especially if this means that we ignore foreign policy, humanity, global society, and the just ordering thereof-- which Ebel says are obviously what September 11 is also about. Ebels list implies that a larger, broader causal story needs to be told, rather than simply to say that Islam gave us the horrors of September 11. I agree wholeheartedly. Believing too simplistic a causal story carries both moral and practical flaws. If Islam itself -- or som ething in its nature -- was the have got of the attacks, we could only prevent further attacks by preventing further Islam. In this way, such a simplistic belief would tend to sanction persecution if not genocide against Muslims. From a practical standpoint, we will have to understand the details of the real, long-term causal story if we wish to minimize the threat of repeated terrorism in America.